Update of bug #22552 (project relax):
Priority: 9 - Immediate => 5 - Normal
Severity: 4 - Important => 2 - Minor
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
Corrections to this statement.
The C-code was not initialized with function values.
Therefore a return with 0.0
from target_functions.relax_fit import jacobian, jacobian_chi2, setup
from specific_analyses.relax_fit.optimisation import func_wrapper,
dfunc_wrapper, d2func_wrapper
func = func_wrapper
times = array([ 0.7, 1. , 0.8, 0.4, 0.9])
I = array([ 476.76174875, 372.43328777, 454.20339981, 656.87936253,
419.16726341])
errors = array([ 9.48032653, 11.34093541, 9.35149017, 10.84867928,
12.17590736])
scaling_list = [1.0, 1.0]
setup(num_params=2, num_times=len(times), values=I, sd=errors,
relax_times=times, scaling_matrix=scaling_list)
R = - 500.
I0 = 1000.
params = [R, I0]
chi2 = func(params)
The question is, if minfx can handle inf values?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22552>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@gna.org
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
