Hi, Sorry for not responding earlier, I've just been slowed down by minor RSI issues. The residue names should not be necessary, and relax ignores these in many cases so that a PDB file of a point mutant can be used without problem. Actually, as long as the numbers in the PDB and the data files matches it should be fine. If you do find a problem with relax and missing res names, please report this as a bug! For all user functions requiring sequence information (be that mol name, res name or num, or spin name or num), just set the res_name_col argument to None.
Regards, Edward On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Douglas Kojetin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Is it necessary to have residues names (e.g. ALA) present in relax > input files, as the residue numbers should be sufficient to keep track > of the information? If it is not necessary, how can I configure the > full_analysis protocol/script (or others) to play nicely with input > files that do not contain residue names? The example input files seem > to suggest that residue name is necessary. > > Thanks, > > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-users mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
