I thought we already worked this one out?

Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Maybe this is again an edge case of an insanely difficult optimisation
> surface caused by underestimated errors.  I would recommend creating a
> bug report for this.  And if you could create a mini randomised data
> set which triggers this error (that could be added to the test suite
> as well), that would really help with the debugging the minfx code at
> the moment.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Tyler Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks Seb.
>>
>> It looks like my 'prolate' iterations in the 2nd round are maxing out and
>> this
>> is causing an error output (even though the first round seemed okay):
>>
>>
>> k: 311     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000957e+02])
>>   fk: 2254.7254621187344
>> Entering sub-algorithm.
>>
>>       Newton minimisation
>>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>       Line search:  Backtracking line search.
>>       Hessian modification:  The Gill, Murray, and Wright modified Cholesky
>> algorithm.
>>
>>       k: 0       xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000957e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254621187344
>>       k: 100     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000958e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254579164155
>>       k: 200     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000958e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254537140993
>>       k: 300     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000959e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254495117813
>>       k: 400     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000959e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254453094624
>>
>>       Parameter values: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000960e+02])
>>       Function value:   2254.7254411071449
>>       Iterations:       500
>>       Function calls:   1001
>>       Gradient calls:   501
>>       Hessian calls:    500
>>       Warning:          Maximum number of iterations reached
>>
>>
>> k: 312     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000960e+02])
>>   fk: 2254.7254411071449
>> Entering sub-algorithm.
>>
>>       Newton minimisation
>>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>       Line search:  Backtracking line search.
>>       Hessian modification:  The Gill, Murray, and Wright modified Cholesky
>> algorithm.
>>
>>       k: 0       xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000960e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254411071449
>>       k: 100     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000961e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254369048283
>>       k: 200     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000961e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254327025107
>>       k: 300     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000962e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254285001914
>>       k: 400     xk: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000963e+02])
>>         fk: 2254.7254242978743
>>
>>       Parameter values: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000963e+02])
>>       Function value:   2254.7254200955554
>>       Iterations:       500
>>       Function calls:   1001
>>       Gradient calls:   501
>>       Hessian calls:    500
>>       Warning:          Maximum number of iterations reached
>>
>>
>> Parameter values: array([  2.60992216e-11,   5.00000963e+02])
>> Function value:   2254.7254200955554
>> Iterations:       156500
>> Function calls:   313313
>> Gradient calls:   156813
>> Hessian calls:    156500
>> Warning:          Mu too small.
>>
>>
>>
>> Fitting to spin ':258&:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
>> Method of Multipliers
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> k: 0       xk: array([ 0.,  0.])
>>   fk: 3163.7013439706825
>> Entering sub-algorithm.
>>
>>       Newton minimisation
>>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>       Line search:  Backtracking line search.
>>       Hessian modification:  The Gill, Murray, and Wright modified Cholesky
>> algorithm.
>>
>>       k: 0       xk: array([ 0.,  0.])
>>         fk: 3163.7013439706825
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 414, in <module>
>>   Relax()
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 131, in __init__
>>   self.interpreter.run(self.script_file)
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py", line 270,
>> in
>> run
>>   return run_script(intro=self.__intro_string, local=self.local,
>> script_file=script_file, quit=self.__quit_flag,
>> show_script=self.__show_script,
>> raise_relax_error=self.__raise_relax_error)
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py", line 531,
>> in
>> run_script
>>   return console.interact(intro, local, script_file, quit,
>> show_script=show_script, raise_relax_error=raise_relax_error)
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py", line 427,
>> in
>> interact_script
>>   execfile(script_file, local)
>>  File "full_analysis.py", line 673, in <module>
>>   Main(self.relax)
>>  File "full_analysis.py", line 300, in __init__
>>   self.multi_model()
>>  File "full_analysis.py", line 665, in multi_model
>>   minimise(MIN_ALGOR)
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/minimisation.py", line
>> 362,
>> in minimise
>> minimise.minimise(min_algor=min_algor, min_options=min_options,
>> func_tol=func_tol, grad_tol=grad_tol, max_iterations=max_iterations,
>> constraints=constraints, scaling=scaling, verbosity=verbosity)
>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/generic_fns/minimise.py", line
>> 239,
>> in minimise
>>   minimise(min_algor=min_algor, min_options=min_options, func_tol=func_tol,
>> grad_tol=grad_tol, max_iterations=max_iterations, constraints=constraints,
>> scaling=scaling, verbosity=verbosity)
>>  File
>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/specific_fns/model_free/mf_minimise.py",
>> line 987, in minimise
>>   results = generic_minimise(func=self.mf.func, dfunc=self.mf.dfunc,
>> d2func=self.mf.d2func, args=(), x0=param_vector, min_algor=min_algor,
>> min_options=min_options, func_tol=func_tol, grad_tol=grad_tol,
>> maxiter=max_iterations, A=A, b=b, full_output=
>> ag=verbosity)
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/generic.py",
>> line 412, in generic_minimise
>>   results = method_of_multipliers(func=func, dfunc=dfunc, d2func=d2func,
>> args=args, x0=x0, min_options=min_options, A=A, b=b, l=l, u=u, c=c, dc=dc,
>> d2c=d2c, func_tol=func_tol, grad_tol=grad_tol, maxiter=maxiter,
>> full_output=full_output, print_flag=
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/method_of_multipliers.py",
>> line 143, in method_of_multipliers
>>   results = min.minimise()
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/method_of_multipliers.py",
>> line 403, in minimise
>>   results = self.generic_minimise(func=self.func_LA, dfunc=self.func_dLA,
>> d2func=self.func_d2LA, args=self.args, x0=self.xk, min_algor=self.min_algor,
>> min_options=self.min_options, func_tol=None, grad_tol=self.tk,
>> maxiter=maxiter,
>> full_output=1, pr
>> b_print_flag, print_prefix="\t")
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/generic.py",
>> line 343, in generic_minimise
>>   results = newton(func=func, dfunc=dfunc, d2func=d2func, args=args, x0=x0,
>> min_options=min_options, func_tol=func_tol, grad_tol=grad_tol,
>> maxiter=maxiter,
>> full_output=full_output, print_flag=print_flag, print_prefix=print_prefix)
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/newton.py",
>> line 44, in newton
>>   results = min.minimise()
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/base_classes.py",
>> line 233, in minimise
>>   self.new_param_func()
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/newton.py",
>> line 166, in new_param_func
>>   self.line_search()
>>  File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/base_classes.py",
>> line 339, in backline
>>   self.alpha, fc = backtrack(self.func, self.args, self.xk, self.fk,
>> self.dfk,
>> self.pk, a_init=self.a0)
>> TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> :S  It overwrites a pre-existing file!  And the important script of
>>> all things!!!  That'll have to be fixed.  Seb, could you submit a bug
>>> report for that?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Sébastien Morin
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Oh... Sorry... It's still early in the morning here (Quebec City)...
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Dont' forget to specify a log file...
>>>>
>>>> LOG   ->   relax -l LOG script.py
>>>>
>>>> TEE   ->   relax -t LOG script.py
>>>>
>>>> If you just specify the script, the script will be erased by the log...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Séb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sébastien Morin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tyler,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want all output from relax to go to a log file, use the option
>>>>> '-l'... (relax -l script.py)
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want all output from relax to go to a file AND the terminal
>>>>> (display), use the option '-t'... (relax -t script.py)
>>>>>
>>>>> These options are visible when typing : ./relax --help  (or relax -h)
>>>>>
>>>>> Good luck !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Séb  :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyler Reddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, I submitted the report. Let me know if there's more information
>>>>>> you need
>>>>>> or a better way to submit bug reports in general.. haven't done this
>>>>>> before.
>>>>>> Also, I had to manually copy/paste the output, and while it looks fine,
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> there is a problem with the same pdb structure getting read twice or
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> that's probably just my pasting error from the unix terminal to the
>>>>>> browser.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On that note, how can I fix this command:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> relax full_analysis.py > STDOUT.txt 2> STDERR.txt
>>>>>> tcsh: Ambiguous output redirect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or better yet, can I merge all the output streams to a single text file
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> display the output in the terminal at the same time as well (maybe I'm
>>>>>> getting
>>>>>> too ambitious there..)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, I do get the same output for 'ellipsoid' as well, as Seb asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tyler
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This issue looks like a problem with the loaded PDB structure.  The
>>>>>>> 'local_tm' and 'sphere' optimisations do not utilise structural
>>>>>>> information, but the 'oblate' and 'prolate' spheroids, and the
>>>>>>> 'ellipsoid' all require this info.  Normally relax will catch this
>>>>>>> problem and deselect the spins without XH bond vectors, but this seems
>>>>>>> to be broken in the 1.3 versions hence you get the original cryptic
>>>>>>> Python error.  As this is a real bug with the relax source code (and
>>>>>>> not a yet-to-be converted feature or a sample script), would you be
>>>>>>> able to submit a bug report for this issue?  The relax bug tracker is
>>>>>>> located at https://gna.org/bugs/?group=relax and the link at
>>>>>>> https://gna.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=relax allows you to create a
>>>>>>> report.  That would be much appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The bug report will be useful for having this error caught by the
>>>>>>> relax test suite - if I can replicate the bug there then I can play
>>>>>>> with the bug and fix it.  Note the the actual problem occurred earlier
>>>>>>> starting with the loading of the PDB file at the structure.read_pdb()
>>>>>>> user function.  So if you could include all print out from that user
>>>>>>> function to the end of the traceback error message, that would be very
>>>>>>> useful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Tyler Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Seb,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just tested 'oblate' and it produces the same error output.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tyler
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Quoting Sébastien Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Tyler,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you get the same error when trying the 'oblate' or 'ellipsoid'
>>>>>>>>> diffusion tensors ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sébastien
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tyler Reddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm having an issue with the full_analysis.py script. It seems to
>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>> fine when
>>>>>>>>>> DIFF_MODEL = 'local_tm' or 'sphere' (converges on 4th round) but
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> 'prolate'
>>>>>>>>>> I get the following output:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Grid search
>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Searching the grid.
>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 408, in
>>>>>>>>>> <module>
>>>>>>>>>>    Relax()
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 125, in
>>>>>>>>>> __init__
>>>>>>>>>>    self.interpreter.run(self.script_file)
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 270, in
>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>    return run_script(intro=self.__intro_string, local=self.local,
>>>>>>>>>> script_file=script_file, quit=self.__quit_flag,
>>>>>>>>>> show_script=self.__show_script,
>>>>>>>>>> raise_relax_error=self.__raise_relax_er
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 531, in
>>>>>>>>>> run_script
>>>>>>>>>>    return console.interact(intro, local, script_file, quit,
>>>>>>>>>> show_script=show_script, raise_relax_error=raise_relax_error)
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 427, in
>>>>>>>>>> interact_script
>>>>>>>>>>    execfile(script_file, local)
>>>>>>>>>>  File "full_analysis.py", line 673, in <module>
>>>>>>>>>>    Main(self.relax)
>>>>>>>>>>  File "full_analysis.py", line 284, in __init__
>>>>>>>>>>    grid_search(inc=inc)
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/minimisation.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 152,
>>>>>>>>>> in grid_search
>>>>>>>>>>    minimise.grid_search(lower=lower, upper=upper, inc=inc,
>>>>>>>>>> constraints=constraints, verbosity=verbosity)
>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/generic_fns/minimise.py", line
>>>>>>>>>> 185,
>>>>>>>>>> in grid_search
>>>>>>>>>>    grid_search(lower=lower, upper=upper, inc=inc,
>>>>>>>>>> constraints=constraints,
>>>>>>>>>> verbosity=verbosity)
>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/specific_fns/model_free/mf_minimise.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 479, in grid_search
>>>>>>>>>>    self.minimise(min_algor='grid', lower=lower, upper=upper,
>>>>>>>>>> inc=inc,
>>>>>>>>>> constraints=constraints, verbosity=verbosity, sim_index=sim_index)
>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/specific_fns/model_free/mf_minimise.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 987, in minimise
>>>>>>>>>>    results = generic_minimise(func=self.mf.func,
>>>>>>>>>> dfunc=self.mf.dfunc,
>>>>>>>>>> d2func=self.mf.d2func, args=(), x0=param_vector,
>>>>>>>>>> min_algor=min_algor,
>>>>>>>>>> min_options=min_options, func_tol=func_tol, g
>>>>>>>>>> l, maxiter=max_iterations, A=A, b=b, full_output=1,
>>>>>>>>>> print_flag=verbosity)
>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/generic.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 319, in generic_minimise
>>>>>>>>>>    xk, fk, k = grid(func=func, args=args, grid_ops=min_options,
>>>>>>>>>> A=A, b=b, l=l,
>>>>>>>>>> u=u, c=c, print_flag=print_flag)
>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minfx/grid.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 129, in grid
>>>>>>>>>>    f = func(*(params,)+args)
>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/maths_fns/mf.py", line
>>>>>>>>>> 506, in
>>>>>>>>>> func_diff
>>>>>>>>>>    self.diff_data.calc_di(data, self.diff_data)
>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/maths_fns/direction_cosine.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>>>> 64, in calc_spheroid_di
>>>>>>>>>>    data.dz = dot(data.xh_unit_vector, diff_data.dpar)
>>>>>>>>>> TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for *: 'NoneType' and
>>>>>>>>>> 'float'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the bug you mention, I've fixed this and the changes are in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> repository.  There were a few other issues to do with subsequent
>>>>>>>>>>> LaTeX
>>>>>>>>>>> compilation and these have been fixed too.  You can see the new
>>>>>>>>>>> sample
>>>>>>>>>>> script at:  http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/1.3/sample_scripts/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Tyler Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) I changed that line and I'm still having a bit of trouble (see
>>>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>>> below).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The errors that I'm using are described as 'the standard
>>>>>>>>>>>> error for each
>>>>>>>>>>>> parameter... [which] is an easy calculation from the covariance
>>>>>>>>>>>> matrix.'
>>>>>>>>>>>> Paraphrasing from the author there--I'm guessing this isn't the
>>>>>>>>>>>> optimal
>>>>>>>>>>>> input?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) I'm not sure it's explicitly stated in the manual, but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> assumption that you run the multi-model script first and then
>>>>>>>>>>>> modsel to
>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>> on the right model for each given residue. A few weeks ago I was
>>>>>>>>>>>> experimenting
>>>>>>>>>>>> with this and if I didn't leave the global correlation time as
>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed the
>>>>>>>>>>>> computation seemed to take a VERY long time (unclear if it was
>>>>>>>>>>>> ever going to
>>>>>>>>>>>> finish).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, as a side note, since my peptide is actually in a micelle,
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>> sure if
>>>>>>>>>>>> there's anything extra I can do for diffusion tensor and
>>>>>>>>>>>> correlation time
>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff. I know some programs (i.e. the Mathematica notebooks by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Spyracopoulos) read in PDB files for diffusion tensor
>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations, but I
>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect it's a bit of a mess when the system is more complicated
>>>>>>>>>>>> than the
>>>>>>>>>>>> structure in the PDB file would suggest.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Output:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Latex()
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> relax> pipe.create(pipe_name='results', pipe_type='mf')
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> relax> results.read(file='results', dir=None)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Opening the file 'results' for reading.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 408, in
>>>>>>>>>>>> <module>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Relax()
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 125, in
>>>>>>>>>>>> __init__
>>>>>>>>>>>>  self.interpreter.run(self.script_file)
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>> line 270,
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>  return run_script(intro=self.__intro_string, local=self.local,
>>>>>>>>>>>> script_file=script_file, quit=self.__quit_flag,
>>>>>>>>>>>> show_script=self.__show_script,
>>>>>>>>>>>> raise_relax_error=self.__raise_relax_error)
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>> line 531,
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> run_script
>>>>>>>>>>>>  return console.interact(intro, local, script_file, quit,
>>>>>>>>>>>> show_script=show_script, raise_relax_error=raise_relax_error)
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>> line 427,
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> interact_script
>>>>>>>>>>>>  execfile(script_file, local)
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "latex_mf_table.py", line 220, in <module>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Latex()
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "latex_mf_table.py", line 68, in __init__
>>>>>>>>>>>>  self.table_body()
>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "latex_mf_table.py", line 186, in table_body
>>>>>>>>>>>>  self.file.write("%9.3f & %9.3f & " % (spin.s2, spin.s2_err))
>>>>>>>>>>>> AttributeError: 'SpinContainer' object has no attribute 's2_err'
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using a new system test, I found one more bug in the script.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  This has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been fixed in the 1.3 repository line.  If you haven't used
>>>>>>>>>>>>> subversion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to check out (and update) the 1.3 line, then you can see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> required in my commit at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-commits/2008-10/msg00402.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just change the line starting with '-' to the line starting with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> '+'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, it may take a few minutes for the link to be generated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Edward d'Auvergne
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a bug in the sample script.  Try adding a ':' character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of line 171 in your script.  I've fixed this in the 1.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line and will try to add a system test to the program to try to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> catch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any bugs before you do ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Tyler Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been trying to use the latex python script on the aic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results file.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the syntax error below. Not sure if I'm doing something wrong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a small problem with that line of code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Latex()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 408,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <module>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Relax()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/relax", line 125,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __init__
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  self.interpreter.run(self.script_file)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 270, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  return run_script(intro=self.__intro_string,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local=self.local,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script_file=script_file, quit=self.__quit_flag,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show_script=self.__show_script,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise_relax_error=self.__raise_relax_error)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 531, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run_script
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  return console.interact(intro, local, script_file, quit,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show_script=show_script, raise_relax_error=raise_relax_error)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Applications/relax-1.3.1/relax-1.3/prompt/interpreter.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 427, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interact_script
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  execfile(script_file, local)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  File "latex_mf_table.py", line 171
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  for spin, spin_id in spin_loop(return_id=True)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Tyler Reddy <[EMAIL 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been using the multi model and model selection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relax 1.3.2 but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have trouble displaying the output in a tabulated format.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to produce an xml document with various headers that isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks like format='columnar' isn't supported. I wonder what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> options I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to look at this data? For some reason, I don't recall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on a Linux machine a few weeks ago (using a Mac OS 10.4 at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment), but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyways it would be nice to get readable model-free output.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The results file is now in XML format and the more readable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'columnar'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format has been removed from the 1.3 line.  With the change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XML results file all the contents of a data pipe,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrespective of what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that data is, is packaged.  So you can put data into this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pipe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself and it will save that information (for advanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complex python objects will need the to_xml() and from_xml()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methods
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to package and unpackage the data).  The reason for removing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'columnar' format was that it was considered too inflexible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes occuring in the 1.3 line, it contained duplicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had numerical precision issues, and there were alternatives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to easily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view this data.  You can use the value.display() and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value.write()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user functions to display and save the results for a single
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If needed, these user functions could be extended to accept
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a list of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then there is the sample_scripts/latex_mf_table.py sample
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will generate a LaTeX table of the model-free results.  This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be copied and modified - this requires learning a bit of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python - to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format and display the results any way you wish.  And finally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone really wants to, and has the skills to, they can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modify this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sample script to recreate a version of the 'columnar' format.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be added to the relax sample scripts, and if their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skills are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very advanced, then much code from the 1.2 relax versions can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recycled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The error input for the relaxation rate parameters is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-linear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curve fitting standard deviation. I'm not sure if that means
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subsequent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> analysis will be completely incorrect? I guess it depends on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnitude between these errors and the type of error that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propagated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relax during its own curve-fitting (which I am unable to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm guessing this is the sum of squared error value (SSE)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fit.  Or is it a regression coefficient or a chi-squared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value?  Did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fitting use a technique such as bootstrapping or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jackknife
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulations to estimate the parameter errors via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propagation?  Or did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it use the covariance matrix?  If it is the SSE, chi-squared,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regression coefficient then that value cannot be used.  This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wildly wrong and cause massive failure in model selection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  It will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause big problems in optimisation, and if you are unlucky
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spaces with long, curved valleys or flat curved spaces
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leading to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimum (that's model-free models m5 to m8 in most cases and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uncommon in model m4) then the minimum can be squeezed and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another completely different region in the space.  It will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause model failure issues, which although removed by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eliminate()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user function, might discount the best solution.  I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all of this will have a measurable affect on the final
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diffusion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tensor as well and, if so, this will cause the appearance of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artificial motions (my 2007 JBNMR paper at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b702202f explains these problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in detail).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If one is not careful with the errors and they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significantly off,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the result is that the results may not be real.  So I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use the error if it comes from an established error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propagation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technique (i.e. from data to parameter error propagation).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>
> This is the relax-users mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
> reminder, or change your subscription options,
> visit the list information page at
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>




_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to