Hi,

Concerning the AIC value, you're absolutely right. A negligible (-> 0)
Rex should yield the same chi2 as a nested  model, but a AIC value
different by 2...

Regards,


Séb


Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Sébastien Morin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> PY is next to me and we discussed this issue together.
>>
>> This seems very strange since values of the AICc criterion (extracted
>> during model selection) are not equal for models with or without these
>> 10e-19 Rex... If this is in s-1, then the criterion should be almost
>> equal as a Rex of 10e-19 s-1 would be negligible.
>>     
>
> For this value, see below.  If Rex really is zero between 2 nested
> models where the Rex parameter is the only difference, the AIC values
> should be different by 2!  The reason is because as:
>
>     AIC = chi^2 + 2k,
>
> if Rex = 0, then the other parameters must be the same (unless of a
> model or optimisation failure) and the chi-squared values equal.
> Hence as the parameter number difference k_diff = 1, then AIC_diff =
> 2.
>
>
>   
>> Moreover, if using the latex_mf_table.py script, the Rex values are
>> reported and associated to the 800 MHz field strength with values in s-1
>> between 1 and 6... These values correspond to those we would obtain by
>> multiplying the Rex values in the xml results file by (2 pi frq)**2...
>>
>> Hence, I would think values extracted in the xml file, that is values
>> one gets with the command "value.display('Rex')", are in the field
>> independent format obtained from Rex/omega**2.
>>
>> Are we wrong ?
>>     
>
> I just checked the code in the math_fns package, and the chemical
> exchange is handled internally as Rex/omega**2.  Looking at the XML
> dumping code, this just dumps the contents of the spin container
> directly to file, hence the value is Rex/omega**2.  Therefore the
> comment in the XML results file is incorrect.  Would you be able to
> file a bug report for this?  Then the fixes can be tracked.  It would
> be better to have two reports, one for the latex_mf_table.py script
> and one for the XML results file.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>   


-- 
Sébastien Morin
PhD Student
S. Gagné NMR Laboratory
Université Laval & PROTEO
Québec, Canada


_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to