On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:57:23PM +0100, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It might be worth talking with Jack Howarth (howarth att bromo dott
> med dott uc dott edu) as he is the maintainer of the relax fink
> packages.  You can see our previous discussions about fink at:
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?q=fink&btnG=Google+Search&domains=http%3A%2F%2Fnmr-relax.com&sitesearch=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.gna.org%2Fpublic%2Frelax-users
> 
> He modified the sconstruct script for this, but I don't think this was
> merged upstream (it's not in the 1.3 line).  Maybe all of these
> problems is because one of the other essential components of fink have
> been upgraded (numpy, python, etc.) causing a breakage in the relax C
> modules and in the Scientific python module.
> 
> I you have the time and would like to try to get the 1.3 line test
> suite passing 100% and attempt to deposit the newest relax versions
> into fink, this would be appreciated.  relax should run without
> problems on Mac OS X, and it shouldn't be too hard to modify relax for
> 100% compatibility.  The only problem for me is that I don't have Mac
> hardware.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Edward
> 
> 

Edward,
   I think I see this users problem. The stable branch doesn't have the
newer scons 1.2 release moved over from unstable. If he changes the line
in Trees line in /sw/etc/fink.conf to read...

Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/crypto

the issue should be fixed with...

fink selfupdate
fink update-all
fink rebuild relax-py26

I'll ping the fink developers to move the newer scons over into stable.
              Jack

_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to