Dear Maddy, Welcome to the relax mailing lists. The problem you are seeing appears to be a version mismatch between relax and minfx, though I cannot understand why. If you would like to try, relax version 1.3.5 was released a few days ago (http://gna.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=2205). This version has minfx bundled with it, so there should be no version mismatch issues. Note that the full_analysis.py script has been highly modified and improved, so I would recommend using the newer version of the script. You can download the appropriate distribution package from http://www.nmr-relax.com/download.html.
Regards, Edward On 14 June 2010 10:40, M Strickland <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have recently started using the full_analysis.py script for my data at > 600 and 900 MHz. I had no trouble with the local_tm calculation, but > when I went onto 'sphere' I think I encountered a problem with minfx. I'm > using Python 2.6.5, Minfx 1.0.2 and Relax 1.3.4. I've attached the log of > what happens when I run the full analysis script. It appears to be a > minfx problem, but I can't work out what. Any ideas? > > Maddy Strickland > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-users mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users > > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
