Hi Edward,

They have now changed it to peak heights, I have checked by exporting some
data.  All you need to do is update by clicking 'project>updates' and it's
now sorted out - to check it's updated correctly, when you export a Sparky
peak list it should say height instead of intensity.  Glad that's sorted
out!  Won't take too long to convert now...

Maddy


On Mon, January 10, 2011 10:52 am, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> Oh, if it is volumes, then that would be a problem.  Hopefully it is
> easy for them to sort out at their end, and also easy for you to
> convert your old data to heights.
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
> On 10 January 2011 11:50, Maddy Strickland <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> I have sent an email to them, so it should get sorted out.  I checked
>> the
>> numbers exported against the peak lists within the program, where it
>> shows
>> both height and volume and it looks like it is exporting volume
>> unfortunately.
>>
>> ---------------------------- Original Message
>> ----------------------------
>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [bug #17341] Compatibility with CCPN Analysis2.1
>> (fwd)]
>> From:    "Edward d'Auvergne" <[email protected]>
>> Date:    Mon, January 10, 2011 9:51 am
>> To:      "Maddy Strickland" <[email protected]>
>> Cc:      [email protected]
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would guess that this problem is not so bad as it seems.  It is
>> probably a superficial bug in the conversion to Sparky format, but
>> that it actually contains the peak heights from Analysis rather than
>> the volumes as it indicates.  This will have to be clarified with the
>> CCPN people though.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Edward
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 January 2011 11:28, Maddy Strickland <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Jo,
>>>
>>> Thanks for that, you're right is it exporting the volume rather than
>>> the
>>> peak height.  I definitely will email them as this error has undone
>>> about
>>> a year's worth of work for me!  I suppose it will be quicker the second
>>> time round though.  Looking forwards to recalculating T1, T2, NOE and
>>> Lipari-Szabo for 4 proteins at 2 fields!
>>>
>>> Maddy
>>>
>>> ---------------------------- Original Message
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Subject: Re: [bug #17341] Compatibility with CCPN Analysis2.1 (fwd)
>>> From:    "Jolyon Claridge" <[email protected]>
>>> Date:    Wed, January 5, 2011 5:34 pm
>>> To:      "Edward d'Auvergne" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc:      "M Strickland, Science 04" <[email protected]>
>>>         "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It would appear that the Format Converter in Analysis is exporting the
>>> peak volume rather than the height and I think you are using box sum
>>> integration, hence the bx. This is a bug in the Format Converter as
>>> Analysis is able to measure both height and volume. Can you send it in
>>> to the CCPNMR mailing list as a bug? As an aside, is it really
>>> necessary
>>> to convert the files to sparky format at all? I usually just use the
>>> 'export' function directly from the peaklist editing window in Analysis
>>> and then create a text file which relax will be able to handle without
>>> any further trouble.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jo
>>>
>>>  Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It shouldn't be a problem at all.  I have no idea what the bx means
>>>> then either, it's strange that they put that there.  I hope it really
>>>> is a hight integration that it's doing :S  Well, if you have all
>>>> spectra duplicated, then you will be able to have an error estimate
>>>> per spectrum.  For a sanity check, this should be similar to the value
>>>> of the RMSD of the baseplane noise in each spectra.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Edward
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 20 December 2010 14:47, M Strickland, Science 04
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what the bx means, I've been removing it in my final
>>>>> files.
>>>>> Analysis just gives the option between height and intensity and I
>>>>> pick
>>>>> height.  Unfortunately, I don't know how they measure it, but I
>>>>> generally
>>>>> get duplicate spectra for all my results, and at two field strengths,
>>> so it
>>>>> shouldn't be an issue for my calculations?
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>>>>> Date: 17 December 2010 20:33 +0100
>>>>> From: Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]>
>>>>> To:
>>>>> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [bug #17341] Compatibility with CCPN Analysis2.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maddy,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm in the process of adding this data to the relax test suite, and
>>>>> noticed that the integrated values have 'bx' after it.  Would you
>>>>> know
>>>>> what that is?  Are you using box integration, or measuring peak
>>>>> heights?  Can CCPN Analysis measure peak heights?  If you are using
>>>>> box integration without duplicate spectra, this significantly
>>>>> complicates the analysis as you will need to know the exact number of
>>>>> points used in each box.  Peak heights are a much better way of
>>>>> determining the peak intensities as one advantage is that the errors
>>>>> are much easier to ascertain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Edward
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17 December 2010 16:48, anonymous
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>  <http://gna.org/bugs/?17341>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Summary: Compatibility with CCPN Analysis2.1
>>>>>>                 Project: relax
>>>>>>            Submitted by: None
>>>>>>            Submitted on: Fri 17 Dec 2010 03:48:15 PM UTC
>>>>>>                Category: relax's source code
>>>>>>                Severity: 2 - Minor
>>>>>>                Priority: 5 - Normal
>>>>>>                  Status: None
>>>>>>                 Privacy: Public
>>>>>>             Assigned to: None
>>>>>>         Originator Name: Madeleine Strickland
>>>>>>        Originator Email: [email protected]
>>>>>>             Open/Closed: Open
>>>>>>         Discussion Lock: Any
>>>>>>                 Release: 1.3.5
>>>>>>        Operating System: GNU/Linux
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    _______________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Details:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When using FormatConverter (with CCPN Analysis2.1) you can output
>>> 'Sparky'
>>>>>> format peak lists for use with curve fitting in Relax.  These have a
>>>>>> different format to those expected by Relax1.3.5.  Differences are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Relax:  Two header lines, Analysis:  One header line
>>>>>> Relax:  V1504N-HN,        Analysis:  V1504N-V1504HN
>>>>>> Relax:  Peaks in order,   Analysis:  Random order of peaks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached: R1.py script, lists for two residues, log file of output
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> Relax, sequence
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    _______________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> File Attachments:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Fri 17 Dec 2010 03:48:15 PM UTC  Name: log.txt  Size: 24kB  
>>>>>> By:
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=11610>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Fri 17 Dec 2010 03:48:15 PM UTC  Name: peak_lists.tar.gz
>>>>>>  Size:
>>> 645B
>>>>>> By: None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=11611>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Fri 17 Dec 2010 03:48:15 PM UTC  Name: R1A.py  Size: 4kB   By:
>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=11612>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Fri 17 Dec 2010 03:48:15 PM UTC  Name: sequence.out  Size: 44B
>>> By:
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=11613>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    _______________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reply to this item at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  <http://gna.org/bugs/?17341>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>  Message sent via/by Gna!
>>>>>>  http://gna.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the relax-devel mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- End Forwarded Message ----------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>> M Strickland, Science 04
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>>
>>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Jolyon Claridge
>>> Research Associate
>>> Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics      [email protected]
>>> University of Oxford                    Tel: ++44 (0)1865 613200
>>> Oxford, U.K., OX1 3QU
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Madeleine Strickland
>>>
>>> MCJC Group
>>> N317, School of Chemistry, Bristol University
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>
>>> This is the relax-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>> visit the list information page at
>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> Madeleine Strickland
>>
>> MCJC Group
>> N317, School of Chemistry, Bristol University
>>
>>
>


Madeleine Strickland

MCJC Group
N317, School of Chemistry, Bristol University


_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to