Hello,
I dont see this error when i start he relax. I do solved the problem. It
seems some formatting error associated with the R1/R2 and noe files, was a
culprit.

Also, when i was checking my results from the previous run, i noticed relax
did not run "prolate spheroid" and "oblate spheroid" modes. It did create a
final folder with all the files. Also, the correlation time given by relax
seems to be double of what we got from model-free, how can this be
possible? It was based on sphere mode.

regards
ravi


On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Ravi,
>
> I've noticed a peculiar message in your log file attached to your bug
> report at http://gna.org/bugs/?20277.  The message is at the start of
> file (https://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=16728) and is:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
> "/Applications/relax.app/Contents/Resources/lib/python2.7/wx/_core.py",
> line 16768, in <lambda>
>     lambda event: event.callable(*event.args, **event.kw) )
>   File
> "/Applications/relax.app/Contents/Resources/lib/python2.7/wx/_core.py",
> line 13634, in SetSelection
>     return _core_.BookCtrlBase_SetSelection(*args, **kwargs)
> TypeError: in method 'BookCtrlBase_SetSelection', expected argument 1
> of type 'wxBookCtrlBase *'
>
> Do you see this message every time you start your Mac OS X relax
> application?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
>
>
> On 31 October 2012 09:33, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Ravi,
> >
> > Would you be able to explain the problem in more detail?  The error
> > message you see will block you from completing an analysis.  Could you
> > include the output of:
> >
> > $ relax --info
> >
> > This will help me to work out what is wrong.  What steps are required
> > to reproduce the problem?  I would recommend submitting a bug report
> > to https://gna.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=relax.  If you could run
> > relax in logging mode with:
> >
> > $ relax --log ravi_failed_analysis.log --gui
> >
> > and then attach the log file to this bug report (please do not attach
> > files to mailing list messages), I should be able to get a better
> > understanding of what is happening.  It is quite strange that this is
> > occurring for one analysis and not another.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Edward
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 31 October 2012 03:30, Ravi Pratap Barnwal <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I completed one set of run for my free protein and results are very
> good. Is
> >> there a way to get the overall correlation time for my protein. Apart
> from
> >> this, i was trying to run the relax for my complex but relax has started
> >> giving me errors like this,
> >> *******************************************
> >> Exception raised in thread.
> >>
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>   File "gui/analyses/execute.pyc", line 87, in run
> >>   File "gui/analyses/auto_model_free.pyc", line 808, in run_analysis
> >>   File "auto_analyses/dauvergne_protocol.pyc", line 234, in __init__
> >>   File "auto_analyses/dauvergne_protocol.pyc", line 561, in execute
> >>   File "auto_analyses/dauvergne_protocol.pyc", line 768, in
> model_selection
> >>   File "prompt/uf_objects.pyc", line 219, in __call__
> >>   File "generic_fns/model_selection.pyc", line 314, in select
> >>   File "generic_fns/pipes.pyc", line 67, in bundle
> >>   File "generic_fns/pipes.pyc", line 466, in test
> >> RelaxNoPipeError: RelaxError: The data pipe 'aic - mf (Tue Oct 30
> 18:02:41
> >> 2012)' has not been created yet.
> >>
> >>
> >> What could be doing wrong with it? I am using data from two different
> >> fields.
> >>
> >>
> >> regards
> >> ravi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Edward d'Auvergne <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ravi,
> >>>
> >>> I will answer your questions below:
> >>>
> >>> > (1) I am running this program on macpro computer with i7 processor
> and 4
> >>> > Gb
> >>> > run. When the program is running in GUI mode, it slows down the
> >>> > computer. is
> >>> > it normal or is there a way to make it faster without slowing down
> the
> >>> > computer?
> >>>
> >>> A full model-free analysis - i.e. execution of the full protocol and
> >>> not simply running the basic model-free models - can require a long
> >>> time to calculate.  This is explained in a few places in the relax
> >>> manual, for example:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/d_Auvergne_protocol_script_mode_execution.html
> >>>
> >>> and:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/new_protocol_in_GUI.html
> >>>
> >>> Essentially this is a long calculation which can take up to a couple
> >>> of weeks to complete, depending on the system, and you can use Gary
> >>> Thompson's multi-processor code to speed things up if you need
> >>> (http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/multi_processor_framework.html).
> >>>
> >>> Depending on your operating system, you can use priorities to allow
> >>> your computer to run at a reasonable speed during an intensive
> >>> number-crunching calculation.  You can renice processes using, for
> >>> example, 'top' in GNU/Linux and Mac OS X systems.  In MS Windows you
> >>> can use the task manager to reset the priorities.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > (2) My protein is 152 amino acid long. it seems the program  is
> running
> >>> > for
> >>> > last few days and many more models to complete. Usually how long
> does it
> >>> > take to complete a full automated run?
> >>>
> >>> As it says in the manual, this is not possible to predict but it can
> >>> take up to a couple of weeks.  If you are lucky, then only a few days
> >>> are required.  This really depends on what types of internal dynamics
> >>> you have as well as the quality of the R1, R2, and NOE relaxation
> >>> data.  You can check the quality of the data using the Sebastien
> >>> Morin's consistency testing analysis in relax
> >>> (http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Consistency_testing.html).  It might
> >>> be worth running the relaxation curve-fitting and NOE calculation
> >>> through relax as well to be sure of the error estimates:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Relaxation_curve_fitting.html
> >>> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Calculating_NOE.html
> >>>
> >>> These are simply links to the relevant chapters of the relax user
> >>> manual.  What software did you use to calculate your R1, R2, and NOE
> >>> data?  My paper:
> >>>
> >>> d'Auvergne, E. J. and Gooley, P. R. (2008). Optimisation of NMR
> >>> dynamic models II. A new methodology for the dual optimisation of the
> >>> model-free parameters and the Brownian rotational diffusion tensor. J.
> >>> Biomol. NMR, 40(2), 121-133.
> >>> (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-007-9213-3).
> >>>
> >>> talks about this as well.  See figure 2 for an idea of how long global
> >>> convergence of the combined model-free optimisation and model-free
> >>> model selection problem can take.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > (3) what are differences between local_tm models and model-free
> models?
> >>> > What
> >>> > i could see is that local-tm models have tm with it whereas
> model-free
> >>> > models dont!
> >>>
> >>> This is again described in the manual:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/model_free_models.html
> >>>
> >>> However a much better description is given in some of my published
> papers:
> >>>
> >>> d'Auvergne E. J., Gooley P. R. (2007). Set theory formulation of the
> >>> model-free problem and the diffusion seeded model-free paradigm. Mol.
> >>> Biosyst., 3(7), 483-494. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b702202f).
> >>>
> >>> and:
> >>>
> >>> d'Auvergne, E. J. and Gooley, P. R. (2008). Optimisation of NMR
> >>> dynamic models II. A new methodology for the dual optimisation of the
> >>> model-free parameters and the Brownian rotational diffusion tensor. J.
> >>> Biomol. NMR, 40(2), 121-133.
> >>> (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-007-9213-3).
> >>>
> >>> Note that these papers also describe the protocol that you are using.
> >>> The Lipari-Szabo model-free theory is only part of the problem.  On
> >>> top of this is the bigger problem of the internal bond motions verses
> >>> external global tumbling.  A number of protocols have been developed
> >>> over time to solve this problem (see the manual and the above papers
> >>> for a list of these protocols), and in relax via the GUI you are using
> >>> the new model-free protocol that I developed in the group of Prof.
> >>> Paul Gooley.  You can click on the 'About' button in the GUI for more
> >>> information.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > (4) I want to see the results of local_tm run which seems to be over
> >>> > with
> >>> > aic and tm0-tm9 folders created having results.bz2 in it? How to
> check
> >>> > the
> >>> > results, for example, i want to see the overall correlation time of
> my
> >>> > protein, how to see the results.bz2 file and which folder to check?
> How
> >>> > to
> >>> > look for other parameters?
> >>>
> >>> You will have to wait until the analysis is finished.  To understand
> >>> what is possible, you will need to minimally read the two references
> >>> given above.  But to properly understand the complexity of the
> >>> analysis you are performing, you should really read all the relevant
> >>> references listed in the citations chapter of the user manual
> >>> (http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Citations.html, though the citations
> >>> here are not properly built so you should see the PDF version of the
> >>> manual http://download.gna.org/relax/manual/relax.pdf).
> >>>
> >>> After reading these, you will note that there is no overall
> >>> correlation time for the local tm models - and this is the power of
> >>> these models and the key to the start of the protocol I developed.
> >>> You will also see that you need to wait until the protocol has
> >>> completed to obtain the information that you are after.  Until then
> >>> relax will not be responsive and you will not be able to do anything.
> >>> I would also recommend looking at Figure 1 of my 2008b paper.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > Since, i am trying use relax for 1st time, these questions might be
> >>> > naive of
> >>> > its kind. Sorry for any inconvenience and looking forward to hear
> from
> >>> > your
> >>> > side.
> >>>
> >>> This isn't a problem.  If you have any other questions or need
> >>> pointers to the right documentation, user manual section or reference,
> >>> don't hesitate to ask.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Edward
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to