Hi Angelo,

I've now implemented your idea about creating the field strength
dependent Rex file for all field strengths
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user/1428/focus=1429).
 This is described in a bit more detail in the commit messages:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.scm/16660
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.scm/16661
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.scm/16662
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.scm/16663

These changes should come out in relax 2.2.5 once released.  It is
only available in the model-free auto-analysis of the
auto_analysis.dauvergne_protocol module (this is the analysis in
Michael Bieri's relax GUI).

Cheers,

Edward



On 20 March 2013 09:55, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The comment at the top of the file is now implemented
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.scm/16603).  However
> this just missed out from being included into relax 2.2.4 by one day.
> It will be present in relax 2.2.5 whenever that version is released.
>
> As for the idea of Rex files per field strength - that is a brilliant
> idea.  I now have to work out how this could be implemented in relax.
> I'm currently thinking of adding the 'scale' argument to the
> value.write and value.display user functions.  That way the value of
> omega**2 for the spectrometer can be used to scale the Rex values.
> Then I could use this in the model-free auto-analysis (which is
> essentially a large relax script,
> http://www.nmr-relax.com/api/auto_analyses.dauvergne_protocol-pysrc.html)
> to produce the files automatically at the end of the analysis.  I will
> have to think about this for a while longer.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> On 19 March 2013 14:53, Angelo Figueiredo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear Edward,
>>
>> Sorry my late reply.
>> Thanks for the advice. I got already the new relax 2.2.4 and it seems be
>> running smoothly well.
>> About the Rex term, I think is a splendid idea to add the small comment
>> explaining and then appear on the final file
>>
>>  # Parameter description:  Chemical exchange relaxation (sigma_ex = Rex /
>> omega**2).
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Angelo
>>
>> p.s: maybe this is a naive idea but would be possible to get a final file(s)
>> with Rex according to the magnetic field used on the calculation. I think
>> that would be a neat way to get properly all information.
>>
>>
>> 2013/3/18 Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Hi Martin and Angelo,
>>>
>>> You have probably now seen that I have just released relax 2.2.4
>>> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user/1413) - I would
>>> recommend you upgrade as this fixes the Rex values of zero from the
>>> value.write user function.  You'll see that the documentation for the
>>> value.write user function now describes these small values
>>> (http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/value_write.html).  This will still
>>> be confusing for the user as you would still need to read the
>>> documentation, so I might look at adding a small comment to the top of
>>> each file describing the parameter.  What do you think of the
>>> following idea?  The parameter descriptions could be added to the top
>>> of the file as a comment, for example see the current model-free
>>> descriptions at:
>>>
>>> http://www.nmr-relax.com/api/specific_fns.model_free-pysrc.html
>>>
>>> Specifically the 'desc=' arguments to the self.PARAMS.add() calls
>>> which are normally only used in the XML relax state files.  These
>>> descriptions could then be used to add the following text to the top
>>> of the file:
>>>
>>> # Parameter description:  Chemical exchange relaxation (sigma_ex = Rex
>>> / omega**2).
>>>
>>> Do you think this would be sufficiently clear?  If not, could you see
>>> how the description can be improved?  Or would you have a better idea
>>> as to how to convey this information?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Edward
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to