Dear users,

I have recently carried out two seperate model-free analysis on a ~5 kDa 
protein with relaxation data measured at 600, 800 and 900 MHz. I used the fully 
automated analysis scripts for the analysis.

In the first run, I used the lowest energy structure from my 15 structure 
ensemble. I get an oblate diffusion tensor. When I read the results and ask for 
diffusion_tensor.display() in relax, I get the table with all the data which is 
as follows...

Diffusion type   spheroid
  tm (s)            4.63577e-09
  Diso (rad/s)      3.59523e+07
  Da (rad/s)       -3.36136e+07
  Dpar (rad/s)      1.35432e+07
  Dper (rad/s)      1.35432e+07
  Dratio               0.287196
  theta (rad)          0.633624
  phi (rad)             2.61738
  Fixed flag       True

What is confusing me is that, even though the Dratio is 0.287196, the 
individual Dpar and Dper values are exactly the same! I have seen the same when 
I run relax on a complex of the 5 kDa protein and a 1.1 kDa peptide, where 
relaxation data was recorded only for the protein.

I ran another run, this time using the pdb file containing all the 15 lowest 
energy structures. Analysis of the same relaxation data with this structure 
gives me an ellipsoid diffusion model with following parameters..

Diffusion type   ellipsoid
  tm (s)           4.63094e-09
  Diso (rad/s)     3.59898e+07
  Da (rad/s)        2.4722e+07
  Dr                  0.475806
  Dx (rad/s)       1.59863e+07
  Dy (rad/s)        3.9512e+07
  Dz (rad/s)       5.24711e+07
  alpha (rad)          2.59643
  beta (rad)             2.087
  gamma (rad)         0.438009
  Fixed flag       True

I remember reading an old post where Ed mentions that relax is not set up to 
carry out analysis for residues with multiple NH bond vectors since it lies in 
the model-free theory itself. In the same post it is also mentioned that if 
that is the case then relax should give an error. Now, about 5 residues at the 
N terminus and 2 at the C terminus of my 43 residue protein are unstructured 
and show high backbone RMSD. It would be great if i get some help regarding the 
understanding of why in such a case, there was no error given from relax. And 
also, what measures are to be taken to run relax analysis on such a protein 
using the 15 structure ensemble as an input structure. Is this change from 
oblate to ellipsoid a case of over-estimation of the diffusion properties 
occuring due to highly flexible termini in the protein?

Regards,

Vineet


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
relax-users@gna.org

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to