On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:11:11AM +0000, Piñeiro wrote: > * It was delayed: don't know if it is usual, but some module releases > were made the same day of GNOME release, some of them asked by us > (ie gstreamer)
Seems normal due to all the issues. > * Several maintainers are pissed off, some due last changes on glib, > others in general. Some extracts: > Jun 15 19:08:34 <__tim> (but I'm unhappy that you guys aren't > screaming at the glib maintainers a bit more, it seems it could be > handled better) Late minute API change = not good. > <snip> > Jun 16 18:02:29 <behdad> I'm about to send mail about > resigning from pango maintenance > Jun 16 18:02:43 <behdad> it's just so much pain these days, > for little joy > Jun 16 18:03:02 * behdad misses good old days where "make > distcheck" worked everyday... That seems like change for change sake. Not good. > * Some (specifically Owen Taylor) questioned the need of those early > 3.1.x releases. It is to make developers aware that they cannot go too overboard with development :-) > * mx conclusion. Totem has a dependency with mx. So although included > on the release, I skipped it on the jbuildrc file. Some kind on > conclusion about mx is required: hmmm... > * Not really relevant, we can call it the release of > UG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED, as I needed to add > "module_makeargs['xxxmodule'] = makeargs + > 'CFLAGS+="-UG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED"' to 20 different modules, mostly > this missing pango release fixing it. That's as there is some DISABLE_DEPRECATED in the released tarballs, no? IMO we should remove such things from tarballs. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
