On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Piñeiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> * On IRC some people guessed that the delay was some missing 3.2.2 > releases. Specifically ioni found strange a GNOME 3.2.2 release with a > gnome-desktop 3.2.1 > * Well, in my opinion this shouldn't be a reason to stop a GNOME release. > * We have deadlines, so IMHO they should be used as far as possible. > As usual maintainers deadline was this Monday. > * I know that it is normal to include releases done after that > deadline, and in fact asking maintainers to do new releases. > * But IMHO this should be a exception, to be used if something is > failing, not a normal rule. > * And in fact, as this was a stable release, probably not all the > people required to update the previous stable release. > * FWIW, there are about 30 modules with a 3.2.1 release on this GNOME > 3.2.2 release. > * But who knows, probably I'm wrong. Opinions? I don't expect .2 (and much less .3) releases to be 'full' in the sense that every single module gets a new tarball. There's really only a need to do a new tarball is if there are important bug fixes, or if there are lots of translation updates. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
