On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Martin Pitt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But this patch was not a fix, it renamed an existing and perfectly > working function to a different name which different arguments. So > popup_for_device() which is documented to be bindable now isn't, and > popup() which is tagged to be not bindable now silently exists, but > the documentation does not match because it takes different arguments. > So why is this considered a "correction"? My understanding was that gtk_menu_popup was not perfectly working, since it was missing the destroy notify. If the documentation does not match, that is clearly a bug in the implementation of 'Rename to'. Anyway, I need some more opinions from bindings authors before making this decision. Lets see if I collect some. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
