On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sorry I pushed the commit before asking first, I totally forgot of > the freeze. I'm ok with reverting if the freeze break is not accorded. > What I'm asking the permission to implement the designs in > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682540, which is listed as > priority 0 in https://live.gnome.org/ScreenLock/BoF. > It consists of merging the volume, network and battery indicator in > the lock screen in one menu. > > While we're there, the following bugs are open for the screen lock > feature, and affect UI: > - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682542 (makes the a11y > menu reappear in the unlock dialog) > - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682546 (shows the user > name on the left with a padlock) > - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682544 (replaces auth > failed notifications with orange messages) > - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682285 (replaces the drag > handle with three animating arrows) > They all have patches, so I hope they'll be finished before 3.6. I'll > send separate requests for each of them in due time however. >
Thanks for letting us know. As far as I'm concerned, I consider the high-priority issues we've identified in our new features as blocker material. And the one we're talking about here doesn't have any translation or documentation impact that I can see (not even screenshots). So, +1 from me. Lets try to get many of these fixes in this week, so things can settle down after .91. _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
