On 10/12/2012 11:27 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > [More potential topics added at the bottom] > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 13:04 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: >> Potential topics (feel free to add/edit/comment): >> * 3.5/3.6 review: What worked out, what didn't? >> * Potential r-t membership changes >> * Release assignments for 3.7.x >> * First comments on 3.8 feature proposals?: >> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointSeven/Features >> >> Not sure if these are r-t issues, but also something to sort out: >> * Is changing gsettings strings covered by freeze break or not? >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2012-September/msg00181.html >> * WebKitGTK+ has failed to produce a valid POT file (for L10N) for >> two years now. This makes Epiphany (and GNOME) look bad. >> The problem is somewhere between webkit and intltool. See e.g. >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67580 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81969 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45321 >> I can provide more pointers if needed. > * Security bug reports: There's no real policy and clarity how to > escalate. Document who to contact and what to do in Bugzilla (e.g. > restrict access? Though once bugmail has been sent it's out anyway)? * > How strict is our UI freeze? Background:
I think that Joanmarie already pinged some people at the rt IRC channel, but other possible topic is about how "real" this goal would be: https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/Python3Porting BR -- Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
