> IMHO, the first thing to debate if we are willing to expand our role and > scope, assuming that is what the Foundation members want us to do. If we > are, then let's ask the community if that is what they want. If not, we > should document with more detail what we are, what we do, and how far we > will go on our duties. I mention "how far" because that was raised by > Colin on our meeting here at GUADEC with the specific example of bluez > migration.
We have been quite a bit more active in setting direction, in the past year. Big decisions: - replacing fallback mode by classic mode - wayland I have personally be involved in turning both of these from decisions into reality, by publicising the decisions, providing resources, organizing meetings, etc. So, I think we've followed the mandate from last years AGM pretty well. I have the impression that the current discussion is about unhappiness in certain circles with decisions that have been made in individual modules. I have zero interest in turning the release team into a commit police, and I'm not going to participate in that kind of activity. _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
