Hi, On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 00:29 +0530, Himangi Saraogi wrote:
> I am working on the annual report of GNOME. Annual report for which year? > I have written a short report of activities of the release team over > the past year. Please have a look at it and suggest improvements, > corrections or anything that I may have missed. - "3.4 to 3.12": Four releases = covers TWO years, hence my question above. We release two major versions every year. - a lot of stuff feels like extremely generic marketing buzz and leaves me highly confused. "prepared a list of bugs" - in which situation, and for which purpose? "The team worked on sending drafts to the bug squad" - drafts of what? - "Bugs/patches have been added for ATK support on GNOME Shell so that it becomes usable with Orca." - maybe that happened, but how is this related to the release-team, instead of gnome-shell or ATK developers? "Feedback was taken from the users (orca users starts using GNOME ) and marketing team." - This is so vague I don't even know what to say. "were planned to come up" - so did it? "The release team showed its presence at a GNOME Asia," - maybe somebody of us was there, but to me it implies that everybody was. "for whichever features that work (ostree, jhbuild etc.)" - I don't get that. I completely fail to parse the last paragraph. In general, it reads like copying items from https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointNine/Features etc., without explaining it. Plus that work was done by developers, not by the release-team. So I hope this doesn't sound too harsh, but it's confusing me. Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper | [email protected] http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
