Olav Vitters wrote:
> We should make clear what our position is. Reasonable demands are fine.
> Going to us because init systems are lacking is plain weird. I was very
> friendly in my reply, but it needs to be said that going to GNOME for
> init system development is weird.
My proposal would be to engage with the Debian GNOME team, rather than
trying to address the whole project.
> I've spoken to 3 Debian GNOME package maintainers during FOSDEM. They
> said they don't speak up much, they prefer just doing their thing and
> making GNOME work. My intention to Debian is that they should focus on
> providing a good experience. Irrespective if we are a default or not.
> Positive cooperation, because if being a default results is why they
> cooperate or demand things, then that is the wrong reason.
I believe we agree on this, we want GNOME to shine, and the Debian
GNOME team does work with that goal of making it shine in Debian,
that's why I believe in them, and prefer leaving them the role of
addressing internal Debian issues.
Fred
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
