The Webcal shows to 3.12 only :/
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 14:01 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > > Andre Klapper wrote: > > > On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:53 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > > > My gut feeling was that I'd want .92 back but I have now looked at > the > > > > schedule and it makes sense to have .5 after GUADEC, and I wouldn't > > > > want to squeeze too many releases after that. > > > > > > > > Effectively I'm not sure decoupling the freeze would work > effectively, > > > > I would keept it paired to .90. > > > > > > Bleh, I guess we should finalize this really soon now. > > > > > > Though it would mean 4 weeks of no release around GUADEC, I propose to > > > * drop 3.13.5 and introduce 3.13.92 > > > * w21 Aug18 3.13.90 The Freeze > > > * w23 Sep01 3.13.91 String Freeze > > > * w25 Sep15 3.13.92 Hardcode Freeze > > > > Works for me. > > > > > Need to edit releng/tree/tools/schedule/3.14.schedule in Git once I'm > > > back on a machine with my SSH key; anybody feel free to be faster. > > Thanks! I've created https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen and > posted schedule as a "draft" there; still need to create ical file and > copy over; plus announce it to mailing lists. > Maybe we should just drop the "draft" as we're late already anyway? > > andre (need to run, hence didn't finish all this yet) > -- > Andre Klapper | [email protected] > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions. >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
