Hi all, Sorry for the late replay, I was on holidays
On 2 September 2015 at 20:51, Cosimo Cecchi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > Thanks for your reply, please find some comments below. > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Frederic Peters <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I wouldn't want a Google account to be a required part for some of the >> duties of the release team. (certainly I would fail that duty). > > To clarify, my request is mostly related to being the gate-keeper for the > account and what goes in it. > I can't think of a team that would be better suited for that, as we would > effectively be releasing some software as GNOME. > > I'm also curious to understand your concern further. > >> Also, while all is well when maintainers are active (and I am sure >> Ankit would be) the release team does have to build and release things >> when they become inactive. > > > I would not expect this to be the case here; if the maintainer loses > interest in the app and no one else picks it up, I think it would be fine > for us to drop it. Even I understand the Fred concerns, I think r-t is the most appropriate group to hold the ownership of such account. And as Cosimo said, we can always drop the apps if the became not active/unmaintained I personally do not have any idea about how Android/Google Play works, but I volunteer myself if we agree on this Regards, Javier Jardón _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
