Hey Debarshi, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Debarshi Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > > Did the requirements significantly change compared to the old icon? > > How did we solve this same issue back then? > > As far as I am aware, we never did any legal review of the > icons. Maybe there are some established practices here that I am not > aware of? /me looks at jimmac > > What we did do in the past was go through the terms of use of each > service provider before adding them to GNOME. This is what David > Zeuthen told me when he handed it over to me in early 2012. By then > Google was already there, and he was waiting for the legal review of > Facebook and Windows Live. Subsequently, I would contact Karen before > merging any new provider, and she would sometimes review it herself or > ask someone from SFLC to help. > Keeping in mind that I'm not a lawyer and that I'm expressing my own personal opinion, given this information I would just go ahead and update the icon, as our position with regards to Google would not change as a consequence of the update. Of late, it has been hard to evoke much response from the board on > these matters (presumably they were overburdened with other stuff). As an aside, if you still have unresolved issues that require the attention of the board, feel free to poke us! :-) Cosimo
_______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
