On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 06:33 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we are getting ready to start development of gtk 3.90 in master. >> To avoid causing lots of breakage and irritation, here is the plan: >> >> 1) Switch the modulesets to use the gtk-3-22 branch for the gtk >> module >> 2) Rename the gtk module to gtk3 >> 3) Add a gtk4 module that follows master >> 4) Switch applications over to use gtk4 as they are found to work >> >> If you see a problem with that, please let me know. > > Which would mean nothing called "gtk+" in the modulesets? Why not keep > either gtk 3.x or gtk 4.x with that name? > > I'd expect the "gtk+" module to build GTK+ 4.x ("the latest").
I have no strong opinion on this. Not having gtk+ in the moduleset doesn't seem like a big deal to me. The + in the name is a bit awkward, tbh. _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
