Hi everyone, The board voted this through on Monday, and I've updated some bits of documentation accordingly.
- Tracker issue - https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Board/-/issues/166 - Committees page - https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/Committees/ - Release Team page - https://wiki.gnome.org/action/info/ReleasePlanning?action=diff&rev2=79&rev1=78 The only outstanding action is to update the Foundation trademark policy with the details of the modulesets we count as "official". I'll let you know when that's done. Thanks! Allan On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 14:35, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:28 am, Allan Day <a...@gnome.org> wrote: > > The board is hoping to vote on this at its meeting later today. I > > don't think that the vote will have a huge impact on the Release > > Team, but if anyone has any reservations please let us know ASAP. > > Well, besides what I've already mentioned... release team directs core > technical work. I'm not sure it makes sense for the Board to be > managing technical work? > > > The key thing is that the power to decide official GNOME software > > resides with the Foundation. So in the arrangement you describe, the > > release team would need to get authorisation from a staff member > > whenever they want to add or remove a module from the official > > modulesets (core-developer-tools, core-os-services, core-shell, > > core-utilities). > > We could have Emmanuele or another Foundation staff member approve such > changes. I don't think that would be a problem. > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
