On Wednesday 07 March 2007, Tom Albers wrote:
> At Tuesday 06 March 2007 10:41, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > > I like Tom's approach: Define a roadmap with milestones and set dates
> > > to it. If a milestone slips, define if you don't care about the
> > > milestone or the date.
> >
> > AOL. People work towards a date: right now we're way too much in
> > tinker-tinker mode. It's fun to hack, it's fun to get publicity and we're
> > avoiding all the nastiness of actually having people have our software on
> > their computers. But for me, as an application hacker, kdelibs is good
> > enough. Isn't most of the cleanup work done? At least that's my
> > impression. Let it stabilize, define a mechanism to add more
> > functionality later -- so the platform can grow after the release without
> > breaking old applications. And Tom's milestones look good to me, although
> > I think the day for the first beta (or alpha, I'm not particular) should
> > be June 30.
>
> What's with that day?

That's akademy -- but this mail fo mine was written long before the discussion 
started and was somehow held up, so feel free to ignore.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi

Attachment: pgpEufdiOqC5L.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Reply via email to