On Thursday 08 March 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > KDE 4.0 will be reviewed as a Vista competitor, > > that's a marketing issue, and the key is expectation management and clear > communication about how the development process works. > > > and it would make a > > disastrous impression if core elements of the user interface are either > > not present yet or have an extremely bad usability because of a rushed > > schedule. It would also make a disastrous impression if important > > desktop applications (e.g. kdepim) are missing from the KDE 4.0 end > > user release. > > it could be disastrous if we try and tell the world that 4.0 is The > Release To End All Releases. it doesn't need to be disastrous if we > communicate the difference and relationship between KDE4 and the 4.0 > release milestone.
this is a very important point Stephan Binner already brought up in his blog 'Disambiguation "KDE 4", did you mean "KDE 4.0"?' - see also: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2600 KDE4 != KDE4.0 very few (users?) are aware of this I fear :) Dominik (crossposted kde-hci, I'm not subscribed, though) _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
