On Sunday 11 March 2007 23:36, Tom Albers wrote: > Op zo 11 mar 2007 23:09 schreef u: > > - Will there be an Alpha 2 release on 1 June, when the feature freeze > > kicks in? > > Not scheduled. I think it is not needed, we have a alpha 1 on may 1st and > the beta cycle starts 25th June. My idea was to increase release rate > nearing release date. > > 1,5 month between alpha and beta > 1 month between beta's > 2 weeks between rc's
That sounds fine. If there is no alpha 2, we might want to call alpha 1 just alpha, though. > > - To what extent does the release plan cover the Windows port? Is there > > also a native Mac version planned? > > O, you are right, we definitely need to talk with the people doing those > ports. Does anyone know who to contact, I can send them an email and see > what they think. There is the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess that's at least a first point of contact. > > - Calling the release "4.0.0" with the two zeros looks strange. Wouldn't > > it be more common to call it "4.0"? > > This is a real problem I think. On several mailinglists I see that people > are expecting 4.0.0 to be better than 3.5.6. I'm a bit scared that > expectations are too high. Adding an extra 0 might help here? I doubt that such subtle details will have much effect. We better should aim at actually making 4.0 better than 3.5.6 ;-) -- Cornelius Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
