On Wednesday, 25. July 2007, Allen Winter wrote: > I'm ok with the requirements listed above. As long as we make a document > that says "the following stuff might change in future 4.0.0 pre-releases". > And publish, and publicize that document. And it shouldn't be a very long > list.
I agree. > Which reminds me: dfaure is the closest thing we have to a kdelibs > maintainer, IMO. I don't feel comfortable proceeding much farther without > his input. the release team should actually be most responsible for caring about kdelibs. But afaik David is on vacation this week (though he seems to read kde-commits from time to time). > Yes but I thought that's why we wanted to shutdown the API work. > So people would concentrate fully on the apps. > ?? Shifting focus, yes :) > If we say "Beta1", the naysayers will bitch about how horrible. is that bad? Its a beta, right? Dirk _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
