On Tuesday 28 August 2007 6:06:09 pm Jason Harris wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday 27 August 2007 15:54, Troy Unrau wrote: > > So, I've brought this proposal up once before, but here it is again > > Is it too early to declare consensus on this? The proposed schedule (as > revised by Allen) seems like a good plan to me. I think it's important that > the 4.0 release is well received, and I don't think people will be convinced > by the "4.0.0 != 4.x" line. >
I want to revise my revised proposal. :) I think we should add a small list of minimum requirements that must be met before we go into the Release Candidate cycle. One such list might be: - a functional workspace (i.e. Plasma) - oxygen style working - konqueror working - dolphin working - sound working - kmail working - kate working "working" doesn't mean "bug free"; it means no known "grave bugs". "working" means using it doesn't make you want throw your computer out the window. This might mean 6 Betas. Who knows? Having a minimum requirements list will help us concentrate on the areas that really need attention. For example, KMail is hurting because KSSL needs work. -Allen _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
