On Monday 01 October 2007 10:37:06 Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 01.10.07 06:30:25, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > On Saturday, 8. September 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > 5) Should language bindings be part of the development platform? > > > > Richard Dale says "Python and Ruby in good shape by late October, and > > > > possibly C# too." > > > > > > If Richard says he can do it, i say we can try it :-) > > > > Thats not enough. somebody has at least to be able to confirm that the > > bindings *compile*. right now, kdebindings does not compile, and after I > > spent an hour or so looking, I'm sure that it can not compile for anyone > > at all, given the fundamental bugs in the build system. > > > > it is my understanding that Richard uses a completely different build > > system to maintain the bindings, at least thats what he used to do in > > KDE3 times. There has to be at least somebody who maintains the official > > build system, and that person has to be != me. > > Same thing applies to the python bindings, but those are not buildable > with cmake and I don't see why they should be.
I understand that Simon Edwards is working on making them compile with cmake. Simon, can you give us an update about the python bindings? How stable are they? -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
