On Thursday 11 October 2007, David Faure wrote: > AFAIK my colleagues have set up svnmerge and kept an eye on changes, > but still it might be a good idea to make sure we're not overwriting a > bugfix.
I agree. merging sounds safer, even though it screws up annotate. the two branches diverged quite far though, so its a lot of work. > I support the idea of course, I'm just wondering about those small details. > Another "small detail" would be: checking with the translators that they > are OK with all those new strings appearing in the 3.5 branch - so close to > the release. I guess they're more happy of having a kmail release that *can* be translated over one that is totally untranslated. Dirk _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
