On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:48:23 Allen Winter wrote: > > I hope it doesn't come to this. > If there are KDEPIM4 apps that are cause data loss or *really suck* > then we I think we simply shouldn't build them in the toplevel > CMakeLists.txt.
I don't think we have apps in KDE PIM which are in such a bad state that they shouldn't be part of the release. But apps which work on critical data don't get that much test coverage as users are more cautious and don't expose their real data to non-stable versions. So having old and new versions available in parallel would give users a choice and offer a softer migration path. That said, of course we should get all apps as stable as possible. I'm just not sure we can actually reach a quality level which is as high as we want it to be, especially for KMail given that there aren't much people which are courageous enough to work on it (or even use it). -- Cornelius Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
