On Friday 07 December 2007 16:15:01 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Friday 07 December 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > On Friday 07 December 2007 00:49:08 Allen Winter wrote: > > > Yes, KMail is really as bad as indicated in the enclosed message. > > > And so are many of the KDEPIM apps. > > > > That matches what Mirko of KDAB told me. He also said that it should be > > fine by April. > > "should be fine" is always a disturbing statement ;-) > > > One question (therefore CC: Thiago), what is affected by the missing SSL > > support? Or did that arrive in the meantime? > > As far as I know file upload in Konqueror is affected as well.
Urgh. > > > Anyway... how to proceed? Simply leave out the kdepim -4.0.0 tarball? > > > > Yes. Bad luck, but PIM3 works fine in the meantime. > > I guess we shouldn't take a decision until just before the RC2 release. > Let's give people a chance to fix it. It's still a couple of weeks. Maybe > somebody finds back into the project over the holidays ;-) It *is* just before the -rc2 release. Tagging has in fact already been done last week (remember the freeze!), so it's even too latte removing it for -rc2. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
