On Thursday 03 January 2008 05:31:33 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Sunday 30 December 2007, Allen Winter wrote: > > So we could conceivably go back to requiring Qt 4.3.3 instead of > > qt-copy+patches. Comments? > > Indeed, we can not require a patched Qt version. I think the workaround is > fine and we should go back the required version. > Don't worry. We did go back to the required version.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
