On Wednesday 10 September 2008 01:46:13 Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > I'm fail to see benefits in terms that our primary visible users are > distros. Doesn't matter when or how we decide launch, will be in the middle > of schedule of some of then. So unless we decide benefit one distro, which > would be bad, the 6 months is pointless. And is worse, since we, kde > developers are seen distros backport more and more stuff from trunk because > we launched too early or to late the date of their deployment.. > And to make it worse, the "always summer in the trunk" will make then > confuse, and developers ( there's exceptions ) as we know don't care too > much about distro bugs from stable series, imagine in a word without any > kind of freeze
With the seasonal approach we can then easily go down to a 4-months schedule (with two months of winter?), to gain two things: 1) We'll fit better with distro releases. At least they can always ship a pretty recent version of KDE (worst case scenario it would be 4 months old). Without focussing on any specific distro we should in the end provide a better service to each of them. 2) Partly also due to the seasonal approach, less bugs due to less rushing of features: if it doesn't make it for release n, it's not too bad, n+1 is just around the corner. Does that make sense? -Riccardo -- GPG key: 3D0F6376 When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey: 9EBD7FE1 ----- Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平 Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu Mир Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch שלום Shanti Vrede Baris Rój Mír Taika Rongo Sulh Mir Py'guapy 평화 _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
