On Monday 29 September 2008, Benoit Jacob wrote: > If we remove /trunk/kdesupport, then we can use the name > kdesupport-for-trunk without any risk of confusion.
I don't think we want to do that. People working on kdesupport (or fixing the occasional bug) expect it to be in trunk/kdesupport, it's the logical place for it. > Also, why couldn't we have /trunk/kdesupport-for-4.1etc. in parallel > with these tags ? Well not in parallel with "stable" ;-) > I propose: > > tags/kdesupport-devel > tags/kdesupport-for-trunk (what we called kdesupport-stable) > tags/kdesupport-for-4.1 > tags/kdesupport-for-4.2 > etc... > > what do you think? The first two don't make sense to me. If you mean that people should work in the code in one of them, then tags/ is really wrong. > Maybe we also want to put all these in a single tags/kdesupport/ > directory, I don't know. Most people (or kdesvn-build) will only check out one of them, two at most, so it doesn't really matter IMHO. -- David Faure, [EMAIL PROTECTED], sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org). _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
