On 19.12.08 10:43:24, Rex Dieter wrote: > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 19.12.08 15:19:54, Matt Williams wrote: > >> On Friday 19 December 2008 14:41:42 Allen Winter wrote: > >>> Forwarding to the Release Team. > >>> > >>> My opinion on this was to defer to those who know the issues > >>> much better than I. IOW: I'm happy either way. > >>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > >>> > >>> Subject: PolicyKit-KDE destiny > >>> Date: Friday 19 December 2008 > >>> From: Dario Freddi <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> > >>> Hello everyone, > >>> > >>> After spending some time in KDEreview, I think it's time for taking a > >>> decision about the destiny of PolicyKit-KDE. Basically the decision, based > >>> on the proposals we had in the last discussion, is whether going for a > >>> freeze except, or place it in extragear to allow packaging for distros and > >>> throw it in trunk for KDE 4.3. > >>> > >>> I'd like to point again that this does not introduce new APIs or anything > >>> critical, it's just a client for using PolicyKit inside KDE without the > >>> need for the GNOME interface > >>> > >>> After some discussion I'll do whatever was decided. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Dario > >> Where exactly is this to end up? I guess kdebase but which part? runtime > >> or > >> apps? > > > > IMHO apps, as its not a runtime dependency for all kde apps. > > disagree, (as I understand it), policy-kde is not a standalone app, but > a runtime component for policykit-using apps.
Hmm, actually isn't this more something for workspace? As far as I understood the purpose of this is to replace a GTK/Gnome-equivalent if running a KDE desktop. Thats exactly what workspace is for. Andreas -- You've been leading a dog's life. Stay off the furniture. _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
