On Tuesday 30 June 2009 13:43:18 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Monday 29 June 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > Distros just shouldn't directly release the stuff to their users before > > we say "yes, this is the actual release". We could ask the packagers to > > be a bit more careful. > > We used to have the rule that the packages are not supposed to be published > before we announce them, but the enforcement of that got lost meanwhile. > > > We could do a second RC, but I don't see a huge amount of value in it > > *right now*. Tagging won't happen before the end of Akademy, add a couple > > of days until it's out (see the dance above), so the release is really, > > really close to the 4.3.0 release (which is of course also tagged one > > week before). > > I'm fine with doing another RC. we can either do one tomorrow and delay a > week like usual or we do it next week and release earlier. I think most > packagers should have their scripts ready to do a new RC build of packages > within 2-3 days at most. > > My preference is currently to do one early next week and release early.
Uh, that means announcement during Akademy. I could prep everything in advance, of course. Any other opinions? -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
