On Thursday 02 July 2009 15:02:48 Stefan Majewsky wrote: > Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 14:41:07 schrieb Ian Wadham: > > I think there is a strong case for holding over Qt4.5 until KDE 4.4 > > and no case for dropping Kolf 1.9, which is an innocent bystander. > > The problem is that we break more apps by going back to Qt 4.4 (most > prominently most of Plasma, as far as I know), as we break by staying with > 4.5.
Yes, Plasma will show severe breakage with Qt 4.4. Lowering the requirement is not an option if we want a functional desktop shell. In this case, I'd actually opt for removing kolf from the release. It's not ideal and painful, but as it seems, we have to decide between a broken Kolf and a broken Plasma, Kolf, with all due respect is less critical for most of our users. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
