Op Wednesday 30 December 2009 10:10 schreef u: > On Wednesday 30 December 2009 04:33:28 Patrick Spendrin wrote: > > For this special code I checked all changes myself and as maintainer I'd > > say they are ok. They are windows specific anyway... ;-) > Yep, this is quite OK. But what about others? (this is a question not to you, > but a general one ;)) > > It's really great effort to go and fix this, but my concern is that such > changes shouldn't be done a) in pre-release time and b) without an explicit > review by maintainers of the code. That's why I'd suspend such changes until > 4.4 will be released. > > I have seen quite some releases when "innocent" pre-release change introduced > a grave bug :) > > Cheers, > Dmitry.
I agree. I've said the same thing yesterday on IRC. I think it would be best to prevent 'krazy fixes' after beta2 has been tagged, with the exception of license changes and maybe one or two other checks. Anyone objecting if I explicitly add that to the 4.5 schedule? Tom Albers -- KovoKs B.V. KvK: 11033334
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
