Hello, On trečiadienis 04 Rugpjūtis 2010 12:31:27 Lubos Lunak wrote: > > Anyway, at this point I see this as completely lost battle. I guess we > > will need to start adding distro patches (sad) for bumping sonames of > > those public libraries because you do not seem to have much interest in > > following well defined practises in the unix world which are supported > > by > > libc/ldconfig/ld.so.conf. > > And they seem to be quite good excuses for you too, it seems. If you want > this problem solved, kde-core-devel is a much better place for the > discussion then the release-team list at the point when the tarballs are > about to be released. You apparently have known for quite some time, so > yours "you" is actually "we".
s/libsolidinterfaces/libnepomukquery/ in my previous mail. Similar topics have been on k-c-d before [1][2], but POV of "Laziness and unawareness are pretty good excuses for many things." simply prevails. libnepomukquery is a pretty good example of that. People simply don't consider this important enough. In this case, our arguments were apparently discarded because "making an exception for libkonq doesn't make that much sense". I admit it may be a bit late as we do not package pre-releases nowadays (which may be our fault but that's the way it is for now). Therefore, I cannot be in supervisor position for these things until it is "too late" nor anybody would listen to me. [1] http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=124061169122689&w=2 [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02970.html -- Modestas Vainius <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
