Well, step 1 is to get the patch approved. Once that's done and it isn't too far in the future, then we can discuss allowing an exemption. From my point-of-view, I would grant the exemption.
On Friday, May 13, 2011 05:10:27 am Jeffery MacEachern wrote: > Hello, > > I have had a feature patch[0] in progress for a while, but just > finished it up at the last moment, and have not had the chance to get > any code review on ReviewBoard (with the exception of some discussion > on IRC with sreich, leading to the second revision). Pending approval > of the patch itself, I would like to request permission to push it in > for 4.7 slightly late. The feature is listed on the 4.7 Feature Plan, > should not be disruptive, and includes only two new strings. I caught > one small bug in the current patch, which I will be fixing soon, but > all of the functionality is present and operational. > > Thanks, > - Jeffery MacEachern > > [0]: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101348/ > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > -- Allen Winter | [email protected] | Software Engineer KDAB (USA), LLC, a KDAB Group company Tel. USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322), Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
