CC'ing kde-packager@ with the correct address again. Please notice it's
packager, not packagers :)

Allen Winter <[email protected]> writes:

> Howdy,
>
> KDEPIM 4.6 RC2 is now released.
>
> Soon you will find tarballs on ktown in 
> ftp://ktown.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/kdepim/4.5.97
>
> sha1sums
> 4f2248666c4bdbf081c40616835f7154bd604135  kdepim-4.5.97.tar.bz2
> daa5aa06e493b051e8369a77508ec348e4d3690d  kdepim-runtime-4.5.97.tar.bz2
>
> Translations are included as with all the previous KDEPIM 4.6 beta tarballs.
>
> Please test these and let me know if they build ok for you.
>
> Our goal is to release KDEPIM 4.6.0 final with the next KDE SC 4.6.4 bugfix 
> release in eary June.
> For best results, please use with the most recent releases of Akonadi, 
> Soprano, kdelibs4.6 and kdepimlibs4.6

It all built fine on FreeBSD with KDE SC 4.6.3, Akonadi 1.5.3 and
Soprano 2.6.0, along with shared-desktop-ontologies 0.6.0.

Speaking of SDO, last time I asked about the right version to use I saw
the issue was discussed on kde-core-devel and kde-pim, but no definitive
answer was given to kde-packager. Could you please summarize the final
answer for us?

Last but not least:

 * kdepim seems to add a 512x512 icon to oxygen, which is not a category
   in the original oxygen tarballs (or in kdesupport/oxygen), is that
   really intentional?
 * Many documentation files were removed from kdepim in comparison with
   the beta tarballs; was that intended?
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Reply via email to