-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: >> Fragmenting the source tarballs may be only one step but seeing what happens >> in GNOME land, with Redhat employees forcibly pushing people into directions >> they do not want to be taken, I would welcome it if KDE would remain the >> sane, independent desktop enviroment, or even Software Collection, that I >> have come to love. > > Please leave Red Hat out of this! Red Hat has absolutely nothing to do with > these splits! In fact, the main Red Hat KDE packager (Than Ngo) has also > expressed his unhappiness about the split tarballs in the Fedora KDE SIG > discussions. Kevin, it was not meant as a stab at you and your KDE team. My apologies if it came across like that. I do like Redhat's Linux, use it on a daily basis on my laptop even. I also respect Fedora as a testing ground and a distro in itself. No more bad words about your employer. I want to rephrase then: I would like to see KDE keep its independent position and easy build process. Please don't let it grow more GNOME-like in maintenance effort and limitation of the target audience. If you want to give people a feeling of unity (pun intended) when running KDE it should not be given to packagers as a shambles of small un-coordinated source tarballs. Cheers, Eric - -- Eric Hameleers <[email protected]> Jabber: [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3pAg8ACgkQXlaqr6dcvaBaJQCfQQkEn/+NYbrf5le7WRMPRRRM 2JcAnjP4Gjqgyt8L8FzBpB+4elVozvRp =czYD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
