On Saturday, August 27, 2011 21:27:06 Michael Pyne wrote: > On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:33:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > > Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories from > > sysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating kdeaccessibility > > to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y branches to KDE/X.Y I > > think concensus and consistency are important here. Was there a decision > > that the official branches should be named X.Y? Is that documented > > somewhere (I spent some time looking, but didn't find it). > > Yes, this was decided (by a coin flip, natch) at a IRC meeting which was > preannounced on the various mailing lists.
I see this was discussed more on kde-core-devel where support seems to be for KDE/x.y. Although I flipped the coin that gave us "x.y", I was voting even at the time for "KDE/x.y" and fully support switching that "decision" if that's what we end up doing. Regards, - Michael Pyne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
