On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 20:21, Rex Dieter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/17/2011 11:59 AM, Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote: >> >> So,i propose a new timeline addition in which we will check our tarballs >> better and a new bugzilla compoment in which we will be able to >> report regressions and critical bugs which hasn't been fixed. > > There's already a week between initial tarball creation (for packagers) and > official release. Are you proposing making this longer? or... some other > workflow? > > 2 additional comments: > * I think it may be unwise to conflate release engineering with QA, they > really are 2 distinct items (though obviously interelated). > * I'm also of a mind there's no special need for additional bugzilla > components... in the past, when/if regressions or blockers identified in our > "week", they were dealt-with appropriately.
Seems like the basic issue is that the (official) release + a week or two is usually more stable then the release. But that's because the release spurred people to find bugs and fix them. Ian _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
