On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 10:39:45 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > * the kdelibs thing does need to be in, it's part of the ksecrets repo now > via some plugin or something similar
it is supposed to happen with a plugin, yes. that has not yet been implemented. what is in the branch right now is code that can be built if ksecretservice is available. which means right now to make it work one needs to build kdelibs, ksecreteservice, then kdelibs again. not great, but i believe at least one major distro is planning on doing this. in 4.9 this should be resolved using the plugin approach mentioned. > * the kwallet branch does not need to > be in, ksecretservice has it's own gui for handling this stuff that is correct. > > As the discussion was inconclusive on k-c-d, I think we > > should reconsider it > > for the next milestone. > > That's far from what i remember, as far as I remember there were lots of > changes asked for and Valentin met them all. also correct. it would be a shame to see his efforts miss another release. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
