Hi all, while adding version numbers to plasma on bugzilla we ran into some strange inconsistency for the beta and RC numbering.
I assumed the following numbers are used for betas and release candidates: x.x.80 -> beta1 x.x.85 -> beta2 x.x.90 -> beta3 x.x.95 -> RC1 x.x.98 -> RC2 (x.x.99 -> RC3) but the last 4 releases of KDE seem to have a rather inconsistent numbering in that regard. It would be nice to stay with one single pattern to avoid confusion. It would also make the version setting of the various KDE core components on b.k.o easier, and I think the distributions would also welcome a more consistent numbering. How about a note on http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Release_Schedules_Guide ? Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
