Hi Albert, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: >> Hey, >> >> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: >> > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE >> > 4.9. >... > > I've had a look at old Dirk scripts and i think i can get 4.8.80 out quite > easily, anyone against me trying to get the tagging done this thursday?
Wow, that would be fantastic! May I just ask why 4.8.80 and not 4.8.90? I am a bit puzzled by the inconsistency of the numbering of beta and RC releases in the last 4 KDE SC releases, please see also my question about this a few days back. It would really help me and all other triagers to know which is the definite scheme in use. Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
