what is a "bus number"? As for the tcpclient fix: that is perfectly fine. Nobody should be using that anyway, and if they are they are doing something wrong.
On 05/30/2012 10:24 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 09:15:03 Sebastian Trüg wrote: >> The new beta1 release is uploaded to SF now. I will add announcements >> tonight. > > i assume these will be source and binary incompatible with previous releases > due to the removal of tcpclient.h from the build. > > i have put in a stub version of tcpclient.cpp that does nothing other than > tell the developer not to use it ;) it now builds and should be SC and BC. i > pushed this to both master and the 2.8 branch. > > this means we'll need a re-do of the tarballs .. but that's not a big deal. > > so current status is: > > * SC/BC should be restored (though not tested with an automated checker; just > took care of the tcpclient issue) > > * we have a branch (2.8) which releases can be pulled from > > ... we should be good to go? > >> Sorry for the delay. I was moving house and had no internet connection. > > yes, this sucks .. what makes me nervous, and should make us all nervous, is > this implies that soprano has a bus number of 1. that is not tolerable for a > component that so many things in our code relies on. may i suggest that > Vishesh be "promoted" to co-maintainer so that he may also take on tasks such > as these if you become unavailable? it's still a relatively low bus number of > 2, but that's a lot better than 1. > _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
