On Tuesday 03 July 2012 19:25:13 Michael Jansen wrote: > > I do not disagree here, BUT have in mind that since we have private > > packages (used/tested by distro packagers before the release actually > > happens) so YOU is a broad term including the packagers. > > > > > For KDE would say someone else should decide. We could make a release > > > 4.8.80.1 if we have to repackage stuff. But the packagers distros should > > > give input here. I think they should say what is the easiest for them to > > > handle. > > > > I'm sure having a micro release is going to break their scripts that just > > expect 3 numbers. > > I really would like to have some input of real packagers here. I am inclined > to say if noone speaks up now they have to live with whatever we come up > afterwards. I am not caring for people who only complain after stuff is > done when they kept silent while it was discussed and designed. > > INPUT guys. NOW.
The format of the version numbering scheme does not affect slackware packaging. A slightly bigger impact would be to have different version numbers of the individual components. Grs, Heinz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
